Benefits EnrollmentCash transferMixed

New Hope Project — Milwaukee Earnings Supplement

MDRC / New Hope Project · Milwaukee, WI, USA · 1994

Summary

The New Hope Project tested a central insight from welfare economics: poverty is not just about income insufficiency but about the structural barriers that trap people in low-wage, part-time work. New Hope provided a guaranteed earnings supplement to anyone willing to work full-time — creating a floor below which no working adult would fall. The employment effects were real but temporary; the child effects were more lasting. Children whose parents received New Hope benefits performed substantially better in school five years later — particularly boys, who showed lasting academic advantages. The likely mechanism: the earnings supplement and childcare subsidy together enabled parents to work more stable schedules and place children in higher-quality formal childcare settings rather than informal arrangements. The experiment is a foundational text in two debates simultaneously: whether work requirements improve adult outcomes (uncertain), and whether income supplements improve child outcomes (yes, with evidence of durability).

Research question

"Does an earnings supplement — guaranteeing income above the poverty line to anyone who works full-time — improve employment and child outcomes more than standard means-tested welfare?"

Methodology

Intervention

Adults living in poverty in two high-poverty Milwaukee neighborhoods randomly offered New Hope benefits: (1) earnings supplement bringing household income above poverty for any adult working 30+ hours per week; (2) subsidized health insurance; (3) subsidized childcare. If unable to find work, offered subsidized community service job. Program lasted 3 years.

Assignment

Randomized controlled trial; 1,357 adults randomly assigned to New Hope or control

Sample size

1,357 adults (677 treatment, 680 control) in 2 Milwaukee neighborhoods

Primary outcome

Employment rate and earnings; welfare receipt; child academic achievement and social behavior (at 2- and 5-year follow-up)

Effect estimate

Employment: +12 pp at 12 months (largest for those not working at baseline); child outcomes: treatment group children showed higher academic achievement, better social skills, more time in structured childcare; children's academic advantage persisted at 5-year follow-up, strongest for boys (+.28 SD on academic achievement); adult effects faded substantially after program ended

Decision

Study influenced welfare reform design in mid-1990s; child outcome findings cited by researchers arguing EITC expansions are undervalued relative to adult employment effects; New Hope Institute founded to disseminate lessons; MDRC used findings in designing subsequent workforce programs

View source report →

Result

Mixed

Evidence strength

Strong

Randomized controlled trial with large sample.

Replication status

Open for replication

Institution

MDRC / New Hope Project

Location

Milwaukee, WI, USA

Year

1994

Policy area

Benefits Enrollment

Mechanism

Cash transfer

Could your jurisdiction test this?

This finding has not yet been independently replicated. A replication in a new context — a different city, country, or population — is one of the highest-value contributions to the evidence base. If your team could host a replication, we can help with study design, sample-size estimation, and analysis.

Propose a replication →What does "open for replication" mean?

← Back to registry What the evidence shows →