Basic IncomeCash transferMixed

New Jersey Negative Income Tax Experiment

Mathematica / Office of Economic Opportunity / University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty · Trenton, Paterson, Jersey City, and Passaic, New Jersey; and Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA · 1968

Summary

The New Jersey Graduated Work Incentive Experiment was the first large-scale randomized evaluation of a guaranteed-income program anywhere in the world. Initiated under the Johnson administration's War on Poverty and continued through the Nixon administration, it was an extraordinary commitment of resources to answer a single empirical question: how much would poor families reduce their work effort if given a guaranteed income? The political debate at the time presumed the work-reduction effects would be catastrophic. The experimental results were more nuanced: labor supply did decline, but by less than half what critics had predicted, and the largest reductions were among secondary earners (typically wives) who used the transfer to spend more time on child care and household work rather than on leisure. The study established methodological norms (multi-arm randomization across program parameters, long-duration treatment, panel data collection) that subsequent income-maintenance experiments — Seattle/Denver, Gary, Manitoba Mincome — built on directly. Although Nixon's Family Assistance Plan failed in the Senate, the experiment's findings did not. Subsequent US welfare design pivoted toward the Earned Income Tax Credit — a phased-in subsidy that preserves work incentives — rather than the flat NIT model, an explicit response to what the NJ trial had shown.

Research question

"If poor families receive a guaranteed minimum income that phases out as earnings rise (a negative income tax), do they reduce their labor supply, and by how much? Are the work-disincentive effects large enough to make the policy infeasible?"

Methodology

Intervention

Eligible low-income families received cash transfers structured as a negative income tax: a guaranteed minimum income, with the transfer phased out at a specific marginal tax rate as earned income rose. Families were assigned to one of eight cells crossing four guarantee levels (50–125% of the poverty line) with three tax rates (30%, 50%, 70%). Cash transfers were paid for three years.

Assignment

Randomized controlled trial — random assignment to one of eight treatment cells or to a no-treatment control group

Sample size

1,357 low-income two-parent families across four New Jersey cities and Scranton

Primary outcome

Hours worked, earnings, and labor force participation among eligible adults, particularly heads of household and secondary earners

Effect estimate

Husbands reduced hours worked by approximately 5–6%; wives reduced hours by 20–30% (off a low base); overall family labor supply fell by 5–8%. Effects were considerably smaller than the policy debate had assumed but were measurable and statistically significant.

Decision

Results were used in the 1969–1972 debate over President Nixon's Family Assistance Plan, which would have implemented a national NIT. The Plan ultimately failed in the Senate, but the experimental evidence shaped how subsequent welfare reform (including the EITC) was designed — favoring earnings-conditional credits over flat guarantees. Findings remain influential in modern debates over universal basic income.

Result

Mixed

Husbands reduced hours worked by approximately 5–6%; wives reduced hours by 20–30% (off a low base); overall family labor supply fell by 5–8%. Effects were considerably smaller than the policy debate had assumed but were measurable and statistically significant.

Evidence strength

Strong

Randomized trial, replicated across multiple sites or studies.

Replication status

Replicated

Institution

Mathematica / Office of Economic Opportunity / University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty

Location

Trenton, Paterson, Jersey City, and Passaic, New Jersey; and Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA

Year

1968

Policy area

Basic Income

Mechanism

Cash transfer

Featured in evidence syntheses

More from these institutions

Other trials of this mechanism

Cite this entry

Mathematica / Office of Economic Opportunity / University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty. (1968). New Jersey Negative Income Tax Experiment. The Experiment Society Registry. Retrieved from https://www.experimentsociety.org/registry/new-jersey-negative-income-tax (primary report: https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/projects/new-jersey-graduated-work-incentive-experiment)